CKV: I know the current
requirements are not working! I don't agree with these either. I just
think the whole education system needs to be overhauled!!!
CJD: It
absolutely does. But allowing people to become teachers because they
can pass a test and yet have no training or experience in a classroom is
NOT going to be an improvement. There is a difference between a
mathematician and a math teacher. I have
yet to learn anything mathematical from a mathematician. Likewise,
these proposals are suggesting that anyone can be a special education
teacher by taking a test. Maybe that's how the teacher in Kentucky, who
put a child with autism in a duffle bag and placed it in the hallway,
got her credentials.
ED: One of my professors had a
student who was English Ed, ENL, and decided to take the math praxis ii
just because and passed, and then was offered a job as a math teacher.
I'm moving to illinois to be a teacher lol
CJD: I may join you, lol. Special education teachers have a maximum case load of 12.
WD: Not to swerve too far off
this important topic, but have you seen Illinois' budget deficits? The
entire state may have to declare bankruptcy.
CKV: I do not THINK (only my
opinion) that teachers are really taught their subject matter to a level
to earn a degree. My sister has a degree in elementary ed with a minor
in English. She teaches first grade, but after 20 years could not teach
4th or 5th to the degree of knowledge needed to be completely
successful to all the students. Does that make sense? I think some
secondary math teachers can teach algebra for a few years and then
couldn't teach geometry to the standard level that should be required.
CJD: I would agree that a
transition from 1st to 5th grade or algebra to geometry might be
difficult...at first. But I also believe teachers are capable of getting
to that required standard in a shorter period of time than someone who
is not educated in education. I also
believe good teachers do what it takes to be the best at whatever they
are called upon to teach. Teaching cannot be viewed as "just a job".
Unfortunately, Dr. Bennett seems to be taking steps to devalue the
profession.
CKV: I don't know...I think there
is a big difference in being "taught" or "educated" on HOW to teach, and
being ABLE to teach. It is like riding a bike. You know I have just
been left a bad taste in my mouth because of educators. I don't have an
education degree, but I think my children have more from me than most
of the teachers they had.
ED: I
can agree with that statement. I was in a 6th grade math class with two
English Language Learners that I would help. It just happened to be a
math class with one of my professor's daughters in it. I have heard
countless stories from my professor
about what is considered "important" in the classroom and how most of it
has very little pedagogical value to it. More and more teachers are
being told to teach to the test because their jobs are becoming more and
more dependent on those test scores. How can a teacher differentiate or
keep a low affective filter in the classroom when they are seemingly
forced to cram so much information in the kids' head for one test that
is the difference between and raise and a pink slip? Dr. Bennett is
putting too much emphasis on these scores and not enough on learning in
the classroom.
ED: Oh, and my mother has definitely taught me more than most of my teachers and professors. But she's just that way.
CKV: but think about
it...think about all your mom taught you WITHOUT a teachering
license...in this situation before her schooling, she could take the
test and teach others in a classroom more than what those that have the
teaching licenses under the current
statutes and more students would be more successful, you know what i
mean? i mean in your mom's case (as well as some others) just having a
teaching license doesn't make you a better "teacher" of the material.
CKV: But, I have been in
classrooms in IPS where there are hispanics sitting in the classrooms
that do not speak one word of English and they are assigned another
student to interpret what the teacher is saying...how do they interpret
what they don't understand...some schools are really in some serious
crisis
CKV: if you could find some people
like your mom who can speak several languages fluently, and can "teach"
effectively the students would be more educated than what they are
receiving currently with a licensed teacher who only speaks English. i can see both sides to the proposed plan
CJD: After having gone to school
to become a teacher, I will be a BETTER teacher because of my schooling.
And there is plenty of research that says the most successful students
are those whose parents value education and help their children outside
of the classroom. I had issues with teachers, especially where [my son] was
concerned, but I would not trust just anyone who could pass a content
test to be able to TEACH that content.
PN: Did I seriously just read a
post on here that said..."WITHOUT a teachering license"? Enough
said....and you are criticizing educators? hahahahaha
CKV: haha, meant teaching
license...fingers moving too fast...i understand, but you know,
after the kids have certain teachers they had, i might trust one or
atleast give them a chance...i remember [J] being in one class and
every day they sat around on ebay trying to bid on an "YUGO" car, this
teacher had a license but didn't teach ANY material
ED: I feel like with the standard
that education is at currently, where teachers teach more to the test
than to teach students to learn, someone without pedagogical training
could become a "successful" teacher. HOWEVER. I have thought since I was
in 5th grade that I could be a good teacher. Now that I have been
through three years of pedagogical methods courses to teach me how to
teach students to learn, my standards of being a successful teacher have
increased dramatically. Knowing what I know now, I do not think I could
have been a truly successful teacher without this training, just one
that could get students to pass my classes and keep my job.
ED: And
although this is extremely nitpicky it is a huge myth that you have to
know several different language to effectively teach English Language
Learners. This past semester I worked with two Korean students in a
middle school who had been in the united
states both for less than a month. I do not nor have I ever spoken
Korean. However, with the methods I have been taught while obtaining my
English as a New Language license, I know how to appropriately assess
language acquisition and successfully help them acquire English,
incorporate their native language, and still get them to understand the
necessary academic language.
No comments:
Post a Comment